Abstract

This article presents a novel and comprehensive analysis of online hate, arguing that it should be conceptualized as a form of violence rather than simply hate speech, abuse, harassment, or trolling. Building on Slavoj Žižek’s distinction between subjective and objective violence, the paper demonstrates how explicit and visible acts of online hostility obscure the deeper systemic and symbolic structures that perpetuate online violence. It critiques the role of social media platforms in fostering and amplifying divisive content, emphasizing how their algorithmic designs prioritize engagement— often through outrage—at the expense of user well-being. This challenges dominant assumptions that online hate is primarily a product of individual anonymity or online disinhibition, instead highlighting how platform architectures deliberately cultivate antagonism and conflict. Additionally, the article explores the limitations of resistance within digital culture, exposing the paradoxes of liberal values, particularly free speech, in the governance of online spaces. By interrogating the complicity of digital platforms in sustaining online violence, the paper contributes to critical discussions on platform responsibility, digital justice, and the broader sociopolitical consequences of online hate. In doing so, it offers an urgent and theoretically informed intervention into debates on regulation and the ethics of digital communication.